To Squib Or Not To Squib?

By Ryan Corazza

As fans so often do, there has been much dissection of the Bears’ last-second meltdown against the Atlanta Falcons yesterday afternoon. People are blaming the clock keeper. (I ain’t buying that one so much.) Other have turned to the Bears’ decision to squib-kick with 11 seconds left on the clock. This argument has some merit. Here is the thing on that, though: it’s not so much that squibbing was a bad idea. I think after Jerious Norwood just burned the Bears for 85 yards on the previous kickoff, the squib is an OK idea. And even if that return didn’t happen, it’s best not to give the opposing team an opportunity to run the ball all the way back and beat you like that. (A squib, by and large, avoids a big return.)

So, I think the Bears played conventional wisdom here, and looked to their defense to make the one stop necessary to win the game, or perhaps even give up a somewhat big play and keep the Falcons out of field goal range. But, therein lies the problem: it was a poorly executed squib by Robbie Gould. The ball did not get past the Falcons coverage team and into the line of returners. Therefore, they got the ball at their own 44, they got the one pass they needed to get into field-goal range, and yup: ball game.

Perhaps, as David Haugh points out, it was more blown coverage than clock controversies or kicking strategies:

Should Lovie Smith have had Robbie Gould squib-kick the last kickoff? Could Bob Babich have called a more aggressive defense to get in the way of receivers on the final pass play? Was the Georgia Dome clock operator overly generous to the home team by saving one second for the final field goal? All questions can fuel healthy debate. But one fact was hard to dispute: If cornerback Marcus Hamilton drops deep enough to prevent Matt Ryan from throwing the last pass downfield, Bears win. There is no 26-yard completion to Michael Jenkins, no game-winning 48-yard field goal by Jason Elam.

Yeah, that about sums it up just right.

Viewing 4 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    I do understand that its all fine if they get a better squib kick and if Hamilton doesn't allow the big pass play, but I have seen too many squib kicks routinely returned to near midfield in just a couple of seconds, both by the Bears and against the Bears . I have even seen the Bears recently give up points before halftime with a RIDICULOUSLY small amount of time on the clock the EXACT same way that they lost this game, by squibbing it and basically just handing the opps the ball at midfield and saying lets hope our prevent D will not give up a 20 yard pass play here. And those defensive injuries in the secondary are even more important when they know they will have an upcoming pass play of such huge importance after the squib!!! The Bears seem to have a bend but don't break defense.... good in the red zone but very mediocre up until that, so this squib seems to play right into the opponents hands to me. Everything might be different if the clock has 14 or 15 seconds, but 11 seconds all you have to do is make ONE tackle and play the clock and you can't lose.... Why make your team have to make 2 plays instead of only 1? I'm sure some people would complain if they kicked it deep and it was returned for a TD, but I wouldn't be one of them. I think you HAVE to play the clock and the odds at that point and trust your team to make one tackle.
    • ^
    • v
    I agree that either way you look at it, there's good arguments for both. Bottom line is that the Bears choked. They should be embarrassed for what they let happen. Absolutely ridiculous.
    • ^
    • v
    Do some frigging research. Its not rocket science. Look how many seconds the average deep kick burns on game play by play charts on nfl.com. To me it looks like 95% burn AT LEAST 6 seconds, and the vast majority burn around 10 seconds. That means that even if the kick is run back to the 50 yard line, THERE IS NO WAY there is enough time left for 2 plays, 1 being a pass play and the 2nd being a field goal. So basically as long as you kick it deep and don't let it be returned for a TD, you will win. Now look at the average time that goes off the clock for squib kicks.... it is MUCH less than for a deep kick with many only taking around 5 seconds or less off the clock. With 11 seconds left all you need to do is burn 7 seconds of clock time and there isnt enough time for a pass play and then a field goal. But instead the 5 second squib kick left just enough time for 2 plays. LOOK AT THE NUMBERS its simple statistics and logic. You dont even need to know anything football to come to this conclusion.
    • ^
    • v
    Thanks for the counterargument, which has a large amount of merit.

    I did mention, though, that they were exclusively looking to avoid the big return -- which, you're right -- is about the only way to lose if they do a normal kickoff. And you're right: it's not rocket science. Lovie Smith isn't dumb; he just probably liked his odds better doing a squib-kick and hoping the defense held for one possession then getting burned on a return. (Remember, all the defensive injuries transferred to the special teams crew, too.)

    I'm willing to bet if Gould had kicked it back all the way and the Falcons housed it, people would be ticked the Bears didn't squib-kick. Just the nature of the fandom. (Not saying you specifically, tough.)

    And if Marcus Hamilton drops back, it's a non-issue, and the Bears steal a win on the road.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Popular Tags
Chicago Bears
Chicago Cubs
Chicago White Sox
MLB
NBA
NFL
Media
Video
Recent Posts
Bo Knows Pimped Out Golf Carts
The Saints Show Their Super Bowl Rings
Seabrook’s Quest For Two More Cups
Patrick Kane’s Drunken Blur Of A Week
Kris Versteeg Raps Again
Wally Backman Knows How To Get Ejected With Style
A Look At The Blackhawks Parade
Kane Boozes, Roenick Cries and the Hawks Hoist the Cup
Archives
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • Blog Search

    About | Feed
    MOUTHPIECE Blog is a Chicago-centric sports blog which will also comment on national stories and general sports blog-y goodness. If you wish to contact us please email our Executive Producer Brian Dryfhout at bdryfhout@mouthpiecesports.com

    Subscribe to our RSS feed.
    Blogroll
    | Awful Announcing | Ball Don’t Lie | Ballhype | Bricks & Ivy | Can’t Stop the Bleeding | Deadspin | Detroit Bad Boys | Docksquad Sports | EDSBS | FanHouse | Foxy Frenzy | Free Darko | Inside the Hall | Kissing Suzy Kolber | Larry Brown Sports | Mister Irrelevant | NBA Mock Drafts Database | Shutdown Corner | Sports by Brooks | Storming the Floor | The Dagger | The Sporting Blog | True Hoop | With Leather .