Tiger Woods Is Supporting A Candidate For President, But Won’t Tell You Which One

By Eamonn Brennan

Which candidate? You’ll just have to guess, won’t you?

As expected, Wolfe didn’t ask Woods any tough questions, except one. At the end of the interview, Wolfe asked Woods, “Who are you supporting for President?”

Woods answered, while smiling, “One of the candidates. One of the two, definitely.” When asked if he didn’t want to talk about politics, Woods said, “No, it makes things a lot more complicated.”

Brooks believes this infers that he’s supporting John McCain, but I think it actually infers the opposite. Supporting John McCain would actually be a less controversial stance for Tiger Woods. Why? Because the demographic Woods is selling to — the demographic any golfer is selling to, really — is far heavier on affluent middle-aged white men than any other marketing base in sports. It would probably be more controversial among these demographics if Woods, a mixed-race Asian and African American, supported Barack Obama. A nod to John McCain might, as they say, appease the base.

I have no idea who Woods is supporting. It’d be a far more prudent economic decision for the almost-billionaire to see McCain in office, but maybe, at some point, self-interest isn’t all he’s got working. The point is that I have no idea, and neither does anyone else, which is why Tiger Woods is so good at what he does. He’s a blank slate.

Viewing 6 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Completely, completely a thousand times over disagree. I don't know what you had to do to convince yourself of that half-ass argument above, but I recall reading an article you highlighted the other day where Doctors, Lawyers, Investment Bankers, etc were all coming out in droves as donating to Democrats by X:1 ratios (see also: mostly affluent whites). Tiger is a mixed-race African American who has dealt with racial biases as has Obama, there is little doubt not supporting him would be more controversial in my mind, regardless of target market (and Tiger has his market, salesmanship not necessary any longer).

    As a final note, I believe Tiger, as he always does, was speaking generally and his quote has been taken out of context. I believe he was saying that, in general, bringing a discussion of politics into his life just complicates things, not who he will vote for complicates things.
    • ^
    • v
    Like I said, I don't know, and my speculation on what would be best for Tiger sales-wise was just that, speculation. I think disagreement is worthwhile.

    But really, I think the overlap between Tiger's demographic and John McCain voters is probably slightly greater than the overlap between his demographic and Obama supporters. I think that's fair to say. It's also fair to say that he would face criticism from both sides, no matter what.

    Anyway, I didn't take him out of context. I agree that what he was saying is that regardless of his positions it is complicated for him to discuss politics. Obviously, it's bad for business, either way. My point is that I have no idea who Woods would support because I don't know anything about Tiger Woods, which is the exactly way he wants it.
    • ^
    • v
    You're both wrong. He's supporting Nader/Gonzalez.
    • ^
    • v
    I am confused as to how you didn't take it out of context when you and Mssrs. Brooks both refer to his statement of "making things more complicated" and how it can be used to infer/conclude which candidate he is selecting. Brooks says it means he is supporting Obama, you say it means he is supporting McCain, but you both base these statements on a comment made that in my opinion, and if read correctly, does not at all relate to who he is supporting for President.
    • ^
    • v
    OK, then I made that confusing, because it was early and my brain wasn't working very well today. But I see what you mean now, and no, I don't think the "it makes things complicated" means he supports Obama specifically. My bad.

    Now leave me alone. I need a nap.
    • ^
    • v
    You guys are cute!

blog comments powered by Disqus
Popular Tags
Chicago Bears
Chicago Cubs
Chicago White Sox
MLB
NBA
NFL
Media
Video
Recent Posts
Video: There Are Free Throws …
Should Bulls Be Pinning Hopes On A Tracy McGrady Deal?
Would Brett Favre Have Made Super-Bowl Viewership Even Higher?
Video: Best Super Bowl Commercials
Everybody’s Blogging For The Weekend: Super Bowlin’
Bears ‘Hire’ Defensive Coordinator. It’s Rod Marinelli.
Lou On Zambrano: ‘He Looks Absolutely Wonderful’
Devin Hester Wants To Return The Ball More
Archives
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • Blog Search

    Staff
    Sole Proprietor:
    Ryan Corazza | E-mail
    About | Feed
    MOUTHPIECE Blog is a Chicago-centric sports blog which will also comment on national stories and general sports blog-y goodness. E-mail rcorazza at mouthpiecesports dot com with tips and story ideas, if you so desire.

    Subscribe to our RSS feed.
    Blogroll
    | Awful Announcing | Ball Don’t Lie | Ballhype | Blog Chicago Sports | Can’t Stop the Bleeding | Dan Shanoff | Dave’s Football Blog | Deadspin | Detroit Bad Boys | Docksquad Sports | EDSBS | FanHouse | Free Darko | Inside the Hall | Kissing Suzy Kolber | Larry Brown Sports | Mister Irrelevant | NBA Mock Drafts Database | Shutdown Corner | Sports by Brooks | Storming the Floor | The Dagger | The Sporting Blog | True Hoop | With Leather .