Terrell Owens And His Twitter ‘Revenge’ Beg The Question: ‘Does a Retweet Count?’
Anyone watching football yesterday knows two obvious things: 1) Terrell Owens improves the Bills passing attack. 2) Tony Romo is less effective without Owens.
Now, the second part wasn’t immediately obvious after Week 1 because Romo looked awesome against a hapless Bucs team (admittedly, yes, the same hapless Bucs team that Owens and Lee Evans scored against), but it was obvious yesterday on Sunday Night Football as Romo laid an egg against the Giants during the opening for the Cowboys’ new stadium.
Naturally, TO had something to say about the whole affair. Well, kind of — I’m assuming that a “retweet” does count as “saying something” right? (Because it should.)
RT @mcgowanboi: @terrellowens Dallas just found out they had a T.R. problem not a T.O problem !!
TO let that hang out there for a few hours before offering up a fake-sounding, albeit apologetic, tweet of his own:
Look, I’m nt gonna say anything bad about the cowboys, I hate tht sum of my boys played hard & they lost! Hope my boy MB is ok!! Nite!
OK, let’s just move on from the whole “Romo v. Owens” thing, as well as the Cowboys issues with their QB — these are obvious; we don’t need to discuss them — and focus on whether a retweet counts as Owens actually saying something, because I tend to think that’s the issue at stake here, right? (For those Twitter illiterate: A retweet essentially means you are re-broadcasting what someone else already said on the service. In this case, @mcgowanboi said that line to TO, and then TO retweeted it for all his followers to see.)



Last week,
It’s difficult for me to believe this story, but it amuses me all the same. On the Micheal Irvin Show yesterday, former Cowboys defensive linebacker Greg Ellis was complaining about his “diminished role” on the team last season, and eventually — get ready — told the tale of 
DeMarcus Ware, or at least someone pretending to be the Cowboys defensive stud,