Is There Really A 2nd Deal For The Cubs?
It’s up for debate right now. Last night, Darren Rovell tweeted this: “Haven’t yet found a bank who will admit they’ve agreed 2 finance Utay’s second Cubs bid. Is this deal real or a bluff?”
Today, the Sun-Times has a source that’s calling the report of a second deal for the Cubs involving Marc Utay, the one separate from the deal sent along to MLB involving Tom Ricketts, “flat-out wrong.”
So, this is the situation we have right now: anonymous sources saying completely opposing things to different news outlets. Fun! As has always been the case here, nothing is over till it’s over, and even when it appears to be over, it’s not over. I half expect Marc Utay and Tom Ricketts to have some sort of Face/Off transformation, so Ricketts appears to be the owner, but it’s actually Utay’s body. Maybe they can split the bid and become co-owners, and there can be a zany reality show on NBC about their struggles to compromise on key issues.
They can call it “Marc and Tom Plus 25.” I see no reason why it wouldn’t be an immediate success. I look forward to seeing them on the cover of US Weekly for 30 consecutive weeks.



Remember this morning when I wrote how that second suitor Sam Zell was going after vanished, and him and Tom Ricketts came to a preliminary deal of sorts, and though not final,
This is really gonna happen, kids. The Tribune Co. is oh so close to dumping their seemingly only entity of worth right now, the Chicago Cubs, onto a really rich dude.
Mark Cuban is already out of the running for Cubs owner. We already know that much. But, despite complete, utter and total financial destruction across the entire country, it appears that there actually could be a winner announced soon in the silent auction that is being held for the Chicago Cubs. (Despite